My model of existence – the metaphysical and physical

Notes: It's not two things but one thing. Also the lower layer is fundamentally unknowable beyond like what can be known by logical necessity e.g Truth is objectively real, Good exists, God (infinity not theological or ID, just like Raw infinity) is the basis of existence, Love etc Values and Ideals are real objectively etc. … Continue reading My model of existence – the metaphysical and physical

Existence Is NOT Suffering: The Truth About Life

Introduction For thousands of years, many traditions—especially within certain spiritual and religious systems—have claimed that existence is inherently suffering. This idea, often repeated in slogans such as “Life is pain” or “Existence is suffering”, has shaped countless minds and lives, becoming a cornerstone of some philosophies and spiritual practices. But is it actually true? This … Continue reading Existence Is NOT Suffering: The Truth About Life

You are infinitely meaningful. The entire universe literally does not exist without you. All things are connected in the great web of existence. Remove one piece and it all falls apart.

HOLY SHIT - EVERY HUMAN IS MAXIMALLY MEANINGFUL i have a web of dominoes. i flick one they begin to fall in all directions i remove one.  if they are dependent on each other. the whole web collapses.  if they are not dependent on each other the web continues despite its removal existence is contingent … Continue reading You are infinitely meaningful. The entire universe literally does not exist without you. All things are connected in the great web of existence. Remove one piece and it all falls apart.

Why Do Anything?

Why Do Anything? Essay Version Introduction To ask “Why do anything?” is not a trivial question. It is a cry that echoes from the depths of a soul standing on the threshold between existence and oblivion. It emerges when all motivations collapse, when survival feels mechanical, and meaning seems absent. But the question itself is … Continue reading Why Do Anything?

Why Ought the Eagle Not Kill the Mouse? The Metaphysical Truth About Power

Why Ought the Eagle Not Kill the Mouse? ''The strong rule the weak.The eagle kills the mouse.Nature is red in tooth and claw''—this is what we are told. And yet, beneath the violence of this assumption lies a deeper lie:That power is value.That domination is truth.That the hierarchy of flesh mirrors a hierarchy of being. … Continue reading Why Ought the Eagle Not Kill the Mouse? The Metaphysical Truth About Power

THE IS / OUGHT PROBLEM —- SOLVED.

The Collapse of the Is-Ought Distinction: A Metaphysical Foundation for Ethics Introduction: The Ancient Divide For over two thousand years, the question of ethics has wrestled with a problem that seemed inescapable: how can we derive what we ought to do from what is? The Scottish philosopher David Hume crystalized this challenge in the 18th … Continue reading THE IS / OUGHT PROBLEM —- SOLVED.

A Descent into the Abyss to Find the Truth about Meaning and Freewill (And I Found The Answer, Thankfully)

Short version: A Descent into the Abyss to Find the Truth about Meaning and Freewill Introduction This essay is a comprehensive and structured documentation of a philosophical investigation undertaken from a strictly rational, logical foundation. The goal was to examine whether life is meaningful and whether free will exists, without assuming either as a given. … Continue reading A Descent into the Abyss to Find the Truth about Meaning and Freewill (And I Found The Answer, Thankfully)

If I Must Live in Pain Until I Die, Here’s How I’ll do it.

I guess the coldest truth which brings comfort Is that this life won't last forever.  The ride will come to an end one day. The pain will stop.  So then the question becomes,  if I am doomed to live with pain until I die,  is it possible for me to do so?  Is it possible … Continue reading If I Must Live in Pain Until I Die, Here’s How I’ll do it.

⟡ UNIFIED PERSON THEORY (UPT) ⟡

The Unified Person Theory (UPT) is a philosophical model of the human being that explains the structure of subjectivity through two inextricably linked functional modes: consciousness and the felt self. These are not separate substances or dualistic entities—they are interwoven strands of a single being. Together, they form the person.